Escrow Cases
← All topics
Topic brief · 92 records

Seller Proceeds Brief

Cases involving changed seller proceeds, disputed authorization, destination-account changes, impersonation, or post-closing questions about what the file showed before release.

Open topic in search Saved research
Records92Reviewed public cards
Amount extraction2/92Only sourced amounts display
Postures4Complaint, order, opinion, judgment mix
Source ladder3Strongest reviewed source

Recurring file issue

The seller's proceeds destination changed after original instructions were signed. The file later needed to show: (1) the prior instruction, (2) the new instruction with signed authorization, (3) evidence of callback or verification, and (4) the office's action before release.

Typical documents

Seller instructions, Authorization request, Callback log, Wire confirmation, Closing statement, Escrow instructions.

Common disputed facts

What the file needed to show

Signed authorization for the new destination, evidence the prior instruction was retained, callback or verification record, and a documented hold or release decision by the office.

Posture mix

Court of Appeal opinion70
Supreme Court opinion17
Federal court order4
Complaint filed1

Source ladder

Published opinion90
Complaint1
Federal court order1

Court type

California appellate courts68
California Supreme Court17
Federal district courts5
Appellate departments2

Brief limit

This topic brief is generated from reviewed card metadata. It does not claim that every related docket has the same facts or result.

Representative records

Ovation v. Chicago Title — S.D. Cal. order

S.D. Cal. · Federal court order · September 23, 2020

Shows the escrow-account proof problem in a liquor-license funding platform: who owned the funds, which escrow accounts held them, and what source records supported return obligations.

All records

Universal Bank v. Lawyers Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1997 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches lender title-company instruction letters, sub-escrow scope, and ostensible-agency limits when a straw-buyer chain closes without the expected down payment.

Protective Equity Trust v. Bybee — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · 12/1991 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that recording priority obtained through a subordination agreement fails when the senior lender disburses for non-construction uses — a core Ruth/Pollock subordination cluster principle.

Diaz v. United California Bank — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow holder duties when parties issue conflicting instructions and when funds may be released without resolving every dispute.

Burrow v. Timmsen — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.

Jones v. Title Guaranty — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 12/1918 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Foundational California rule that escrow holders who release funds without satisfying deposit conditions owe resulting damages — cited throughout later strict-instruction escrow cases.

Harriman v. Tetik — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 11/1961 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches when pre-close escrow disbursements are authorized by instructions and when sellers may still owe restitution after a failed business-sale escrow.

Pioneer Title v. Guttman — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 11/1959 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Shows escrow holder reimbursement after paying a third-party demand to complete a sale when sellers had approved the demand — applies Jones on conditional escrow deposits.

Dawson v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 11/1950 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Shows how conditional escrow holds and third-party approval requirements affect whether deposited funds are attachable — cited in Amen for strict instruction compliance.

California Executive Escrow v. Bell et al. — Federal court complaint
C.D. Cal. · 10/2020 · Complaint filed

Hinge: Teaches seller-proceeds disbursement review from a federal complaint docket.

Claussen v. First America Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 10/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches limits on escrow and title-agent duties to verify oral down-payment instructions against written escrow terms.

Ruth v. Lytton Savings — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 10/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches automatic subordination escrows: recording order alone does not cure loans that violate express subordination caps on amount, rate, or lien priority.

Ingram v. Glissman — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 2 · 10/1956 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Shows source records needed when business-sale escrow instructions, notes, deposit money, license issuance, and close conditions are disputed.

Greenzweight v. Title Guarantee — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 10/1934 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Defines when an escrow holder has complied with a hold-until-paid instruction before releasing reconveyance documents during a refinance — critical for bank-failure and cleared-check timing disputes.

Ovation v. Chicago Title — S.D. Cal. order
S.D. Cal. · 09/2020 · Federal court order

Hinge: Shows the escrow-account proof problem in a liquor-license funding platform: who owned the funds, which escrow accounts held them, and what source records supported return obligations.

Flyer's Body Shop v. Ticor Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 09/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow holders cannot rely on loan-officer strike-throughs of lien limits without signed principal instructions — real-estate syndication second-deed context.

Business Title v. DLSE — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 09/1976 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.

United States v. Approximately $325,690.00 Seized From Bank of America — E.D. Cal. order
E.D. Cal. · 01/2024 · Federal court order

Hinge: Original instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.

Contemporary Investments v. Safeco Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 3 · 08/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Clarifies when escrow-file notice, assignment or proceeds instructions, and post-close amendments matter for third-party payment instructions.

Zang v. Northwestern Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 08/1982 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Classic escrow-holder negligence case on reconveyance timing, oral instructions, and competing lender recordings.

Pollock v. Tiano — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 08/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches sloppy escrow instructions cannot bind sellers to subordinate beyond the written $96,000 construction cap — buyers must perform the subordination deal they actually negotiated.

Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 07/2010 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches post-close escrow disbursement duties and lender reliance on recorded closing instructions after funding.

Lovelady v. Bryson Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 07/1994 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that escrow files for seller-carried business-sale paper need a document trail showing the promised security interest and recording path.

Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 07/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow holder duties when payoff instructions conflict with recorded note assignments and title-policy notice (Devore purchase escrow).

Business Title v. United States — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 07/1978 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Shows how escrow instructions, notice to creditors, transfer approval, deferred disbursement, and interpleader shape priority to funds held in escrow.

Colonial Savings v. Redwood Empire Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 07/1965 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Contrasts definite written escrow instructions with ambiguous ones — when a lender tells the holder exactly which exceptions to allow, the holder is not liable for liens the instructions left in place.

Turner v. Citizens National Bank — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 07/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that escrow instructions cannot modify a purchase agreement unless all principals authorize the change — agents with express no-modification limits cannot bind co-sellers.

Southall v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 1 · 07/1952 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Lee v. Title cites Southall for the rule that escrow holders are not liable for losses while following instructions and not required to police unrelated seller delays.

Appel v. Boston National Title Agency — S.D. Cal. order
S.D. Cal. · 06/2020 · Federal court order

Hinge: Shows why escrow-account deposit records, written escrow instructions, control over release, and interpleader statements matter when funds are not returned promptly.

Pasternak v. Boutris — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 06/2002 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.

Vournas v. Fidelity National Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 1 · 06/1999 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the source boundary for escrow-holder disclosure duties, escrow instructions, trust instruments, and claimed nonparty or beneficiary protection.

Rost v. Bryson — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 06/1953 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches how courts construe ambiguous escrow disbursement language and why holders are protected when instructions reasonably authorize a commission payout after full deposit.

Angus v. London — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3 · 06/1949 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.

Bedrock Financial v. IRS — E.D. Cal. order
E.D. Cal. · 05/2013 · Federal court order

Hinge: Shows refinance escrow proof issues: closing instructions, lien priority, payoff amount, tax-lien notice, disbursement ledger, and whether proceeds were routed to junior claims.

Hannon v. Western Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1989 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow holders are limited agents who must follow instructions — they are not trustees required to invest idle escrow balances unless the parties contract for interest.

First Central Coast Bank v. Cuesta Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 05/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that escrow funds tied to a commission may remain contingent until close conditions are performed, which matters for file control and release timing.

Gordon v. D & G Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1975 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches strict compliance with seller escrow instructions and implied duties to pay both sellers their share of proceeds at close.

Grover Escrow v. Gole — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 05/1969 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches statutory priority and escrowed-proceeds control in liquor-license transfer escrows.

Coast Bank v. Minderhout — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Ct. · 05/1964 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches recorded lender control agreements tied to improvement loans can still create enforceable security — background for equitable subordination disputes in subdivision escrows (Jones v. Sacramento Savings cites Coast Bank).

Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches equitable estoppel when an escrow holder assures a third-party creditor that loan proceeds will fund promised escrow payments, then closes without honoring canceled instructions.

Sterling Escrow v. Vandernoot — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3 · 05/1957 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches stakeholder handling when an escrow company deposits disputed sale proceeds and asks claimants to litigate entitlement.

Leiter v. Handelsman — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 1 · 05/1954 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches how purchase agreements and escrow instructions are read together, and when written demand to close escrow ends a buyer's obligation to wait for title curative work.

Wales v. Greene — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 1 · 05/1954 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Shows how cancellation clauses, mutual cancellation instructions, license-transfer conditions, and held funds or documents define the escrow holder file obligations.

Norris v. San Mateo County Title — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 05/1951 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches who owns earnest-money deposits held by an escrow agent after default and how res judicata affects recovery from the holder versus the parties.

Schaefer v. Manufacturers Bank — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 04/1980 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that escrow liability is bounded by the escrow file — side agreements and instruments handled after close without escrow involvement do not create holder duties.

Wade v. Lake County Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 04/1970 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow-holder diligence when a buyer's deposit check is accepted with a hold instruction but sellers are not told the funds were never deposited.

Rianda v. San Benito Title — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Ct. · 04/1950 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches strict instruction compliance for escrow deposits — holders are not depositaries who must cash every check received without matching written escrow directions.

Howard v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 04/1937 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Distinguishes written buyer-seller escrow instructions from the holder's separate parol agency duty — background for Amen's later four-year written-contract rule and Simmons exculpatory clauses.

Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers Title — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Court · 03/2002 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches third-party/nonparty escrow duty boundaries, recorded assignments, and lender-of-record disbursement limits from a published Supreme Court opinion.

Escrow Agents Fidelity v. Superior Court — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 5 · 03/1992 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches fidelity-fund and trust-obligation boundaries for licensed escrow agents after trust-obligation losses.

Bruckman v. Parliament Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 03/1987 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches why escrow files must preserve supplemental instructions, title-report timing, cancellation notices, and the close-or-cancel sequence across linked escrows.

Joffe v. United California Bank — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 03/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches how restrictive payee lines on escrow-trust checks limit deposit and payment when a straw buyer diverts a down payment from the named Wells Fargo escrow account.

Ogdahl v. Title Insurance & Trust — California appellate department
Cal. App. Dep't · 03/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches how seller commission instructions and rescission attempts should be recorded before post-close disbursement.

Doyle v. Coughlin — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · 03/1974 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches why escrow close status, license-transfer approval, creditor notices, and interpleader posture are core records in disputed escrow-fund control.

Schut v. Doyle — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 03/1959 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches unclosed escrow deposits still interact with vendor's-lien priority — and that encumbrancers for value can outrank an unpaid seller (cited in Ruth v. Lytton for bona fide encumbrancer rule).

Roberts v. Carter & Potruch — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 03/1956 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow holders are agents, not parties, to the underlying sale contract — and that post-close payment duties with oral instructions face short limitations windows.

Jones v. Sacramento Savings — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 3d Dist. · 02/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow/title officers cannot cure missing subordination forms by switching escrow companies — later loans must meet the written subordination caps to gain priority.

Moore v. Balboa Escrow — California appellate department
San Diego App. Dep't · 02/1953 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches business-sale deposit and commission-disbursement documentation in escrow instructions.

Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Ct. · 02/1941 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow cancellation cuts off contingent third-party payees — paired with Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow on when estoppel can still bind the holder after instruction changes.

Tung v. Chicago Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/2021 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Modern appellate guidance on foreseeability of damages after escrow closes on a rescinded residential sale.

Castillo v. Express Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 01/2007 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches statutory dispute-notice duties for California mobile-home escrows and that form escrow instructions cannot waive Health and Safety Code deposit-hold requirements.

Brown v. Boren — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1999 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches 1990s automatic subordination escrows still require lender compliance with escrow caps — excess loan amounts revive the seller's senior purchase-money lien.

Rooz v. Kimmel — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1997 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches accommodation recordings and hold-harmless releases when escrow/title staff record documents as a non-insured favor — limits recovery for delayed security perfection.

Romo v. Stewart Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1995 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches how credit-bid foreclosures interact with seller proceeds still held in escrow — surplus funds are not automatically swept into the lender's bid.

St. Paul Title v. Meier — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches that escrow agents follow written instructions and cannot shift liability to the opposing party's counsel for ambiguous buyer-side instructions.

Axley v. Transamerica Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1978 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches limited escrow agency: no liability for following written instructions when the seller signed amendments listing substituted security and prior encumbrances.

Cohn v. Gramercy Escrow — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches statutory escrow creditor-priority rules when a liquor-license transfer escrow distributes insufficient cash and a note to the seller before general creditors are paid.

Middlebrook-Anderson v. Southwest Savings — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1971 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches lenders are third-party beneficiaries of seller subordination agreements only while loan proceeds are applied to the agreed construction purpose — priority is contingent, not automatic.

Gramercy Escrow v. Superior Court — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 01/1971 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the file-control question when a creditor tries to reach escrow funds before all close conditions have occurred.

Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the limited-agency rule: escrow holders follow instructions and are not liable for policing unrelated party conduct absent collusion or instruction breach.

Akin v. Business Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches exculpatory escrow clauses do not bar recovery when the holder willfully departs from instructions — including geographic recordation errors after close.

Miller v. Citizens Savings — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches courts read escrow instructions and subordination riders together — lenders cannot claim priority when the recorded loan exceeds the seller-approved construction cap.

Jonathan Manor v. Artisan — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1966 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.

Stockwell v. Lindeman — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1964 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the industry-standard subordination rider text Pollock and Burrow reference — construction proceeds must actually fund improvements to gain priority.

Contra Costa County Title v. Waloff — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1964 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Bridge case between strict-instruction breaches and Prentice-style recovery of attorney fees as escrow damages when a holder mishandles seller proceeds.

Prentice v. North American Title — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Ct. · 01/1963 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches sellers may recover litigation costs as escrow damages when a holder mishandles trust funds — foundational measure-of-damages case for escrow fee disputes.

Spaziani v. Millar — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Contrasts indefinite escrow instructions with Colonial Savings' definite lender letters — teaches when ambiguity creates triable holder-duty issues at trial.

Builders' Control Service v. North American Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow disbursement duties after recorded notice that sale proceeds were assigned to a fund-control agent (foundation for later assignment/payoff cases).

Collins v. Home Savings — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches Van Nuys subdivision escrows: lenders and title companies cannot expand subordination by a later blanket agreement when construction disbursements violate the original escrow instruction limits.

Amen v. Merced County Title — California Supreme Court
Cal. Supreme Ct. · 01/1962 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Teaches third-party escrow payees need a written, enforceable instruction trail — limits oral side deals when funds are disbursed without a signed payee instruction.

Mefford v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 5th Dist. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches limits on escrow-holder liability when a deposit is accepted as a check, held uncashed, and sellers later amend instructions before canceling escrow.

Pacific Firestone Escrow v. Food Giant Markets — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.

Shumaker v. Rippy — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1955 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Historical limitations case in the escrow cluster later disapproved in Amen — useful for understanding when written instruction suits get four years instead of two.

Montgomery v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1948 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches strict compliance with escrow instructions when escrow staff alter recorded instruments after deposit — void deed and limited damages framework.

Bank of America v. Hirsch Mercantile — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1944 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches the baseline rule for qualified subordination agreements — later lenders gain priority only when their loans meet the seller's written conditions.

Hancock Oil v. Hopkins — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 01/1944 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Gallagher v. California Pac. Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1936 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Applies the Jones v. Title Guaranty measure-of-damages rule to a 1930s title-company escrow — foundational for quantifying seller and depositor losses after unauthorized disbursement.

Blackburn v. McCoy — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1935 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches foundational limited-agency escrow law — holders follow written instructions only, a rule Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust and St. Paul Title v. Meier later apply to disclosure duties.

Newport Bay Dredging v. Helm — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1932 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Teaches escrow cancellation ends contingent payee rights because the holder is not a trustee until close — foundational companion to Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust.

Kellum v. San Mateo County Title — California Court of Appeal
Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1932 · Court of Appeal opinion

Hinge: Applies Lattin to a county title company's escrow department — companion to Norris v. San Mateo County Title on deposit ownership in the same county.

Security Trust Bank v. Carlsen — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 01/1928 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Foundational interpleader case for escrow holders — conflicting claims to the deposit do not create independent liability that blocks the stakeholder remedy.

Shreeves v. Pearson — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 01/1925 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Defines how escrow agency status changes once contractual conditions are met — cited in Greenzweight and later bank-failure timing disputes.

Lattin v. Gillette — California Supreme Court
Cal. · 01/1891 · Supreme Court opinion

Hinge: Foundational limitations rule cited in Howard, Shumaker, and Amen — distinguishes writings that create liability from writings that only evidence a breach of an earlier oral duty.

Refine all 92 seller proceeds records in search →

A pattern summary drawn from public filings and orders. Not legal advice, and not a description of any specific company's practices.