N.D. Cal. · Federal court order · January 1, 2025
$717,293.08 · Wire amount · Reviewed metadataData post · generated from reviewed cards
The Amounts at Issue
A conservative readout of sourced amount extraction across reviewed escrow-related court records: which public cards state an amount, what type of amount is shown, and where the current dataset stays silent.
Reviewed records129Public-promoted reviewed cards
Sourced amounts6/129No inferred losses
Amount types4From reviewed metadata
Corpus limitExplicitMissing amounts stay unstated
Amount extraction status
Amount type
Amount confidence
Complaint vs. finding posture
Source ladder
Amount records by hinge
Amount records by stage
How to read this
This is a data post over the public case_amounts field and reviewed card metadata. It uses sourced amounts only, does not imply completeness, and keeps source posture separate from the amount displayed.
Amount boundary
Sourced amounts onlyAn amount displays only when reviewed public metadata contains a source-supported amount or a reviewed summary amount. Captions, allegations, and general dispute descriptions are not enough.
Missing is informationMost reviewed cards do not currently publish a sourced amount. The report treats that as an extraction limit, not as permission to estimate losses.
Posture still controlsA sourced amount can be alleged, ordered, settled, forfeited, or otherwise procedural. The amount line does not convert an allegation into a finding.
Correction pathIf a public source supports a better amount, amount type, or posture label, submit it through corrections with the source link.
Records with sourced public amounts
E.D. Cal. · Federal court order · January 31, 2024
$325,690.00 · Forfeiture amount · Source statedC.D. Cal. · Complaint filed · January 1, 2021
over ~$5.6M · Wire amount · Reviewed metadataS.D. Cal. · Federal court order · February 19, 2020
$200,000 · Wire amount · Reviewed metadataC.D. Cal. · Complaint filed · January 1, 2012
$1.45M · Restitution amount · Reviewed metadataCal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 1970
$15,000 · Escrowed funds · Reviewed metadataThis report excludes private OCR, raw PDFs, source-platform labels, company pages, person pages, regulatory rows, and unreviewed R2 corpus material. It only uses public-promoted reviewed court-record cards, and it does not imply the corpus is complete.