Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 2002
Related by Escrow Instructions + Seller Proceeds · Escrow InstructionsCourt record Court of Appeal opinion
Angus v. London — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three · Civ. Nos. 16655, 16656
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeEscrow InstructionsShows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.
Limit before takeaway
Published appellate opinion only. Interpleader and instruction-formation row; cross-complaint allegations are not findings.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3
- Case number
- Civ. Nos. 16655, 16656
- Filed
- June 8, 1949
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court reviewed two sets of escrow instructions prepared by a bank, later handwritten and deleted changes, and the bank interpleader of remaining deposit funds.
What it hinged on
Escrow Instructions. Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.
Documents to inspect
- Escrow instructions
- Amendments
- Signature pages
- Closing statement
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.
Timeline
FiledJune 8, 1949
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Escrow Instructions·Seller Proceeds
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published appellate opinion only. Interpleader and instruction-formation row; cross-complaint allegations are not findings.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.