Escrow Cases
← Back to search
Court record Supreme Court opinion

Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan — California Supreme Court

California Supreme Court · L.A. No. 16834

Open source record

AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultSupreme Court opinionCourt ruling
HingeEscrow InstructionsDefines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question

Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.

Limit before takeaway

Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row on instruction-communication limits; not a modern operational finding.

Court / region
Cal.
Case number
L.A. No. 16834
Filed
October 4, 1940
Source record
Court opinion
Procedural posture
Supreme Court opinion
Money movement stage
At release
Record gap
Source gap
Strongest reviewed source
Published opinion
Allegation / finding status
Court ruling
Disposition
Supreme Court opinion
Last posture checked
2026-05-31
Reviewed
2026-05-31

What happened

Court discussed title-company escrow instructions, whether an escrow holder knowledge was imputed, and limits on communicating one party instructions to another.

What it hinged on

Escrow Instructions. Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.

Amount involved

Amount not stated in reviewed source.

Result

Supreme Court opinion

Why this belongs here

Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.

Documents to inspect

This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.

What the file needed to show

Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:

Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.

Timeline

FiledOctober 4, 1940
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31

Topics

Escrow Instructions

Related patterns

Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.

Continue research

Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.

Open related search Saved research

Source record

Court opinion

What this record does not show

This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.

Limit: Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row on instruction-communication limits; not a modern operational finding.

Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.