Cal. Supreme Court · Supreme Court opinion · March 7, 2002
Related by Escrow InstructionsShiver v. Liberty Building-Loan — California Supreme Court
California Supreme Court · L.A. No. 16834
Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row on instruction-communication limits; not a modern operational finding.
- Court / region
- Cal.
- Case number
- L.A. No. 16834
- Filed
- October 4, 1940
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Supreme Court opinion
- Money movement stage
- At release
- Record gap
- Source gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Supreme Court opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court discussed title-company escrow instructions, whether an escrow holder knowledge was imputed, and limits on communicating one party instructions to another.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Supreme Court opinion
Why this belongs here
Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.
Documents to inspect
- Escrow instructions
- Amendments
- Signature pages
- Closing statement
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row on instruction-communication limits; not a modern operational finding.