Cal. · Supreme Court opinion · July 20, 1978
Related by Seller Proceeds + Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes · Seller ProceedsCourt record Supreme Court opinion
Business Title v. DLSE — California Supreme Court
California Supreme Court · L.A. No. 30558
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultSupreme Court opinionCourt ruling
HingeSeller ProceedsShows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.
Limit before takeaway
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Stakeholder and creditor-priority row; not a finding that the escrow holder mishandled funds.
- Court / region
- Cal.
- Case number
- L.A. No. 30558
- Filed
- September 2, 1976
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Supreme Court opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Supreme Court opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court reviewed an interpleader brought by the escrow holder after creditors and the United States asserted competing claims to liquor-license sale proceeds held in escrow.
What it hinged on
Seller Proceeds. Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Supreme Court opinion
Why this belongs here
Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.
Timeline
FiledSeptember 2, 1976
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Seller Proceeds·Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Supreme Court opinion only. Stakeholder and creditor-priority row; not a finding that the escrow holder mishandled funds.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.