Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 1 · Court of Appeal opinion · January 31, 2014
Related by Payoff Demands + Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes · Payoff DemandsCourt record Supreme Court opinion
Ghirardo v. Antonioli — California Supreme Court
California Supreme Court · S032435
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultSupreme Court opinionCourt ruling
HingePayoff DemandsTeaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Teaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.
Limit before takeaway
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row for omitted payoff-demand sums after close; not an escrow-holder fault record.
- Court / region
- Cal.
- Case number
- S032435
- Filed
- October 31, 1996
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Supreme Court opinion
- Money movement stage
- Payoff stage
- Record gap
- Amount gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Supreme Court opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court reviewed a payoff demand paid into escrow, close and reconveyance, and later recovery theories for an amount allegedly omitted from the demand.
What it hinged on
Payoff Demands. Teaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Supreme Court opinion
Why this belongs here
Teaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.
Documents to inspect
- Payoff demand
- Lender verification
- Good-through date
- Disbursement authorization
- Escrow instructions
- Record retention log
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Teaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.
Timeline
FiledOctober 31, 1996
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Payoff Demands·Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row for omitted payoff-demand sums after close; not an escrow-holder fault record.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.