Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 1 · Court of Appeal opinion · June 17, 1999
Related by Escrow Instructions + Seller Proceeds · Escrow InstructionsCourt record Court of Appeal opinion
Pasternak v. Boutris — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two · B136083
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeEscrow InstructionsTeaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.
Limit before takeaway
Published appellate opinion only. Coverage and escrow-definition row; read the source for administrative and indemnity scope.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2
- Case number
- B136083
- Filed
- January 1, 2002
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court concluded the subject transactions involved escrows and addressed EAFC coverage for trust-obligation losses tied to the escrow agreements and deposit instructions.
What it hinged on
Escrow Instructions. Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.
Documents to inspect
- Escrow instructions
- Amendments
- Signature pages
- Closing statement
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.
Timeline
FiledJanuary 1, 2002
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Escrow Instructions·Seller Proceeds
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published appellate opinion only. Coverage and escrow-definition row; read the source for administrative and indemnity scope.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.