Escrow Cases
← Back to search
Court record Court of Appeal opinion

Pacific Firestone Escrow v. Food Giant Markets — California Court of Appeal

California Court of Appeal · 202 Cal.App.2d 155

Open source record

AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeSeller ProceedsTeaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question

Teaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.

Limit before takeaway

Published appellate opinion only. Stakeholder and creditor-priority row; no company conduct conclusion.

Court / region
Cal. Ct. App.
Case number
202 Cal.App.2d 155
Filed
January 1, 1962
Source record
Court opinion
Procedural posture
Court of Appeal opinion
Money movement stage
Seller proceeds stage
Record gap
Payee gap
Strongest reviewed source
Published opinion
Allegation / finding status
Court ruling
Disposition
Court of Appeal opinion
Last posture checked
2026-05-31
Reviewed
2026-05-31

What happened

Court reviewed escrowed proceeds from a liquor-license sale, creditor claims, and distribution priority under Business and Professions Code section 24074.

What it hinged on

Seller Proceeds. Teaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.

Amount involved

Amount not stated in reviewed source.

Result

Court of Appeal opinion

Why this belongs here

Teaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.

Documents to inspect

This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.

What the file needed to show

Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:

Teaches creditor-priority and interpleader handling for escrowed liquor-license sale proceeds.

Timeline

FiledJanuary 1, 1962
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31

Topics

Seller Proceeds·Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes

Related patterns

Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.

Continue research

Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.

Open related search Saved research

Source record

Court opinion

What this record does not show

This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.

Limit: Published appellate opinion only. Stakeholder and creditor-priority row; no company conduct conclusion.

Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.