San Diego App. Dep't · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 1953
Related by Seller Proceeds + Escrow Instructions · Seller ProceedsOgdahl v. Title Insurance & Trust — California appellate department
California appellate department · 72 Cal.App.3d Supp. 41
Teaches how seller commission instructions and rescission attempts should be recorded before post-close disbursement.
Published appellate department opinion only. Use for instruction sequence and disbursement timing, not broad title-company conclusions.
- Court / region
- Cal. App. Dep't
- Case number
- 72 Cal.App.3d Supp. 41
- Filed
- January 1, 1977
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court reviewed seller instructions, commission payment, unilateral rescission after close, and whether the escrow holder should disburse after the claimed change.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Teaches how seller commission instructions and rescission attempts should be recorded before post-close disbursement.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Seller Proceeds·Escrow Instructions
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published appellate department opinion only. Use for instruction sequence and disbursement timing, not broad title-company conclusions.