Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 1991
Related by Seller Proceeds + Payoff Demands · Seller ProceedsCourt record Court of Appeal opinion
Jonathan Manor v. Artisan — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, Second District · SOCEF-CAND-0106
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeSeller ProceedsClassic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.
Limit before takeaway
Published Court of Appeal opinion only (1966). Escrow-instruction characterization of notes as unsecured is central holding.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist.
- Case number
- SOCEF-CAND-0106
- Filed
- January 1, 1966
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Payoff stage
- Record gap
- Amount gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court analyzed whether notes secured by subdivision lots delivered in escrow constituted equitable mortgages under Code of Civil Procedure section 580b.
What it hinged on
Seller Proceeds. Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.
Timeline
FiledJanuary 1, 1966
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Seller Proceeds·Payoff Demands
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only (1966). Escrow-instruction characterization of notes as unsecured is central holding.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.