Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 2019
Related by Payoff DemandsSiegel v. Fidelity National Title — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, First District · No. A064772
Explains lender-only ALTA policies in refinance escrows and third-party-beneficiary duties to disclose recorded liens.
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist.
- Case number
- No. A064772
- Filed
- January 1, 1995
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Payoff stage
- Record gap
- Authorization gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court analyzed a refinance escrow where the settlement agent requested only a lender ALTA policy while buyers believed they would receive owner's title coverage through a sub-escrow arrangement.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Explains lender-only ALTA policies in refinance escrows and third-party-beneficiary duties to disclose recorded liens.
Documents to inspect
- Payoff demand
- Lender verification
- Good-through date
- Disbursement authorization
- Escrow instructions
- Wire instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Payoff Demands·Wire Instructions
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only.