Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 2007
Related by Seller ProceedsTung v. Chicago Title — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, First District · No. A151526
Modern appellate guidance on foreseeability of damages after escrow closes on a rescinded residential sale.
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist.
- Case number
- No. A151526
- Filed
- January 1, 2021
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court held whether an escrow holder should foresee post-closing damages after a rescinded sale is generally a jury question, not a matter to decide on pleadings alone.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Modern appellate guidance on foreseeability of damages after escrow closes on a rescinded residential sale.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only.