Escrow Cases
← Back to search
Court record Court of Appeal opinion

St. Paul Title v. Meier — California Court of Appeal

California Court of Appeal, First District · No. A022974

Open source record

AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeWire InstructionsLimits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question

Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.

Limit before takeaway

Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Case number
No. A022974
Filed
January 1, 1986
Source record
Court opinion
Procedural posture
Court of Appeal opinion
Money movement stage
At release
Record gap
Authorization gap
Strongest reviewed source
Published opinion
Allegation / finding status
Court ruling
Disposition
Court of Appeal opinion
Last posture checked
2026-05-31
Reviewed
2026-05-31

What happened

Court held a purchaser's attorney owes no professional duty of care to the escrow agent when allegedly confusing escrow instructions lead to a disbursement dispute.

What it hinged on

Wire Instructions. Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.

Amount involved

Amount not stated in reviewed source.

Result

Court of Appeal opinion

Why this belongs here

Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.

Documents to inspect

This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.

What the file needed to show

Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:

Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.

Timeline

FiledJanuary 1, 1986
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31

Topics

Wire Instructions

Related patterns

Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.

Continue research

Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.

Open related search Saved research

Source record

Court opinion

What this record does not show

This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.

Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.