Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 2025
Related by Wire InstructionsSt. Paul Title v. Meier — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, First District · No. A022974
Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist.
- Case number
- No. A022974
- Filed
- January 1, 1986
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- At release
- Record gap
- Authorization gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court held a purchaser's attorney owes no professional duty of care to the escrow agent when allegedly confusing escrow instructions lead to a disbursement dispute.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.
Documents to inspect
- Wire instructions
- Beneficiary verification
- Callback log
- Outgoing wire confirmation
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only.