Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 1991
Related by Seller Proceeds + Payoff Demands · Seller ProceedsZang v. Northwestern Title — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, First District · Civ. No. 48838
Classic escrow-holder negligence case on reconveyance timing, oral instructions, and competing lender recordings.
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist.
- Case number
- Civ. No. 48838
- Filed
- January 1, 1982
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Payoff stage
- Record gap
- Amount gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court held an escrow holder that cleared title and closed an escrow without following the lender's instructions could be liable for negligence when it recorded a reconveyance and facilitated a competing loan.
What it hinged on
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Classic escrow-holder negligence case on reconveyance timing, oral instructions, and competing lender recordings.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Timeline
Topics
Seller Proceeds·Payoff Demands
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published Court of Appeal opinion only.