Escrow Cases
← Back to search
Court record Supreme Court opinion

Hancock Oil v. Hopkins — California Supreme Court

California Supreme Court · L. A. No. 20202

Open source record

AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultSupreme Court opinionCourt ruling
HingeSeller ProceedsPairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question

Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Limit before takeaway

Published Supreme Court opinion only. Security Trust etc. Bank v. Carlsen (1928) 205 Cal. 309 (supporting link) is the leading escrow interpleader companion case.

Court / region
Cal.
Case number
L. A. No. 20202
Filed
January 1, 1944
Source record
Court opinion
Procedural posture
Supreme Court opinion
Money movement stage
Seller proceeds stage
Record gap
Payee gap
Strongest reviewed source
Published opinion
Allegation / finding status
Court ruling
Disposition
Supreme Court opinion
Last posture checked
2026-05-31
Reviewed
2026-05-31

What happened

Court held escrow and lease stakeholders may interplead when resolving the controversy will determine their delivery duty and any asserted contractual payment obligation is not an independent liability blocking the remedy.

What it hinged on

Seller Proceeds. Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Amount involved

Amount not stated in reviewed source.

Result

Supreme Court opinion

Why this belongs here

Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Documents to inspect

This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.

What the file needed to show

Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:

Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Timeline

FiledJanuary 1, 1944
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31

Topics

Seller Proceeds

Related patterns

Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.

Continue research

Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.

Open related search Saved research

Source record

Court opinionSupporting source

What this record does not show

This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.

Limit: Published Supreme Court opinion only. Security Trust etc. Bank v. Carlsen (1928) 205 Cal. 309 (supporting link) is the leading escrow interpleader companion case.

Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.