Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 2021
Related by Seller ProceedsCourt record Court of Appeal opinion
Burrow v. Timmsen — California Court of Appeal
California Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One · 223 Cal.App.2d 283
AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeSeller ProceedsTeaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question
Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.
Limit before takeaway
Published appellate opinion only. Pollock v. Tiano (1967) 253 Cal.App.2d 183 (supporting link) when subordination performance fails.
- Court / region
- Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist.
- Case number
- 223 Cal.App.2d 283
- Filed
- January 1, 1963
- Source record
- Court opinion
- Procedural posture
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Payee gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Published opinion
- Allegation / finding status
- Court ruling
- Disposition
- Court of Appeal opinion
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-31
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-31
What happened
Court held a deposit receipt referencing the standard Title Insurance & Trust subordination form was sufficiently definite for specific performance when paired with customary note and trust-deed terms.
What it hinged on
Seller Proceeds. Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.
Amount involved
Amount not stated in reviewed source.
Result
Court of Appeal opinion
Why this belongs here
Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.
Documents to inspect
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
- Callback log
- Wire confirmation
- Closing statement
- Escrow instructions
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:
Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.
Timeline
FiledJanuary 1, 1963
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31
Topics
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.
Limit: Published appellate opinion only. Pollock v. Tiano (1967) 253 Cal.App.2d 183 (supporting link) when subordination performance fails.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.