Escrow Cases
← Back to search
Court record Court of Appeal opinion

Money Store v. Southern California Bank — California Court of Appeal

California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three · 98 Cal.App.4th 722

Open source record

AmountNot statedAmount not stated in reviewed source.
ResultCourt of Appeal opinionCourt ruling
HingeWire InstructionsTeaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title).
SourceCourt opinionPublished opinion
File-record question

Teaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title).

Limit before takeaway

Published appellate opinion only. Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title (2010) D054685 (supporting link) applies Money Store to HUD-1 settlement duties after escrow close.

Case number
98 Cal.App.4th 722
Filed
January 1, 2002
Source record
Court opinion
Procedural posture
Court of Appeal opinion
Money movement stage
At release
Record gap
Authorization gap
Strongest reviewed source
Published opinion
Allegation / finding status
Court ruling
Disposition
Court of Appeal opinion
Last posture checked
2026-05-31
Reviewed
2026-05-31

What happened

Court held lender closing instructions can form an enforceable contract with the escrow bank, which may breach by disbursing per a buyer-seller addendum that conflicts with the lender's wire conditions.

What it hinged on

Wire Instructions. Teaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title).

Amount involved

Amount not stated in reviewed source.

Result

Court of Appeal opinion

Why this belongs here

Teaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title).

Documents to inspect

This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.

What the file needed to show

Current reviewed metadata frames the file issue this way:

Teaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title).

Timeline

FiledJanuary 1, 2002
Posture checked2026-05-31
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-31

Topics

Wire Instructions·Disbursement Authorization

Related patterns

Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.

Continue research

Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.

Open related search Saved research

Source record

Court opinionSupporting source

What this record does not show

This reviewed record does not show a court finding that any company or person did anything wrong unless the linked source expressly says so. Read the primary source for allegations, posture, and outcome.

Limit: Published appellate opinion only. Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title (2010) D054685 (supporting link) applies Money Store to HUD-1 settlement duties after escrow close.

Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.