Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · Court of Appeal opinion · January 1, 1997
Related by Wire Instructions + Seller Proceeds · Wire InstructionsCourt record Federal court order
United States v. Approximately $325,690.00 Seized From Bank of America — E.D. Cal. order
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California · 2:24-cv-00381-TLN-JDP
Amount$325,690.00Defendant property in the federal civil-forfeiture order; not a finding of total loss or liability.
ResultOrder denying motionsCourt order
HingeWire InstructionsOriginal instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.
SourceCourt orderFederal court order
File-record question
Original instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.
Limit before takeaway
Federal civil-forfeiture order only. The order denied motions and recited allegations for that posture; it is not a finding that any escrow party was liable.
- Court / region
- E.D. Cal.
- Case number
- 2:24-cv-00381-TLN-JDP
- Filed
- January 31, 2024
- Source record
- Court order
- Procedural posture
- Federal court order
- Money movement stage
- Seller proceeds stage
- Record gap
- Authorization gap
- Strongest reviewed source
- Federal court order
- Allegation / finding status
- Court order
- Disposition
- Order denying motions
- Last posture checked
- 2026-05-30
- Reviewed
- 2026-05-30
What happened
Federal court order in a civil-forfeiture action recited allegations that a home buyer received changed wiring instructions using Pacific Marine Escrow branding before funds were routed through multiple bank accounts.
What it hinged on
Wire Instructions. Original instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.
Amount involved
$325,690.00 · Forfeiture amount · Source stated
Result
Order denying motions
Why this belongs here
Shows the file-record questions raised when a public court order describes changed wiring instructions, escrow branding, recipient-account details, and post-transfer tracing.
Documents to inspect
- Wire instructions
- Beneficiary verification
- Callback log
- Outgoing wire confirmation
- Seller instructions
- Authorization request
This list is inferred from the topic pattern, not asserted as an extracted document list for this case.
What the file needed to show
What the reviewed record suggests the file later needed to show:
Original instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.
Timeline
FiledJanuary 31, 2024
Current resultOrder denying motions
Posture checked2026-05-30
Reviewed for Escrow Cases2026-05-30
Topics
Wire Instructions·Seller Proceeds
Related patterns
Related records are selected from shared topics, hinge category, court type, and posture. They are discovery aids, not claims that the facts or results match.
Continue research
Open a related reviewed-record search or save this trail when the file-record question is worth revisiting.
Source record
What this record does not show
This reviewed record reflects a court or agency order in the reviewed source. It does not extend beyond what that order actually decided; read the source for scope.
Limit: Federal civil-forfeiture order only. The order denied motions and recited allegations for that posture; it is not a finding that any escrow party was liable.
Reviewed California court records with source links. Allegations are not findings.