Escrow Cases

Records

129 reviewed California court records · Updated May 2026

129
Reviewed cases
6
Topics
CA
Jurisdiction
Filter:

Attisha Enterprises v. Capital One Bank — S.D. Cal. order

S.D. Cal. · 12/2020 · Federal court order

Shows the source records needed when a buyer expects escrow funds to reach a title company but the transfer lands in another account: instructions, recipient account, notice, and …

Wire Instructions Escrow Instructions
Federal dismissal order only. Allegations were assumed for motion-to-dismiss analysis; not a finding that any defendant was liable.

Alereza v. Chicago Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 3d Dist. · 12/2016 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the boundary between escrow instructions, named escrow parties, and claimed duties to people outside the escrow file.

Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Nonsuit posture; use for nonparty-duty and escrow-instruction limits, not for broad conclusions about title-company conduct.

Universal Bank v. Lawyers Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1997 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches lender title-company instruction letters, sub-escrow scope, and ostensible-agency limits when a straw-buyer chain closes without the expected down payment.

Wire Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Trial court No. BC128647 (Los Angeles Superior). Supporting link is Claussen v. First America Title (1986) on oral escrow-instruction inquiries.

Freedom Financial v. Golden Pacific Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 7 · 12/1993 · Court of Appeal opinion

Adds payoff-demand doctrine for close-of-escrow reliance: statement amount, expiration, beneficiary demand, and deficiency after payoff.

Payoff Demands Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Payoff-demand doctrine row; escrow is relevant through close-of-escrow reliance timing rather than escrow-holder conduct.

Protective Equity Trust v. Bybee — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · 12/1991 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that recording priority obtained through a subordination agreement fails when the senior lender disburses for non-construction uses — a core Ruth/Pollock subordination clu…

Seller Proceeds Payoff Demands
Published appellate opinion only. Ruth v. Lytton Savings (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 831 and Miller v. Citizens Savings (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 655 (supporting links) on subordination escrow clusters.

Diaz v. United California Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow holder duties when parties issue conflicting instructions and when funds may be released without resolving every dispute.

Payoff Demands Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow (1986) supporting link for later assignment/payoff duty evolution.

Burrow v. Timmsen — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 12/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches automatic subordination language in deposit receipts can be enforced — background for Pollock v. Tiano when buyers later seek broader loans than sellers agreed.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Pollock v. Tiano (1967) 253 Cal.App.2d 183 (supporting link) when subordination performance fails.

Jones v. Title Guaranty — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 12/1918 · Supreme Court opinion

Foundational California rule that escrow holders who release funds without satisfying deposit conditions owe resulting damages — cited throughout later strict-instruction escrow c…

Disbursement Authorization Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Gallagher v. California Pac. T. & T. Co. (1936) 13 Cal.App.2d 482 (supporting link) applies the same measure-of-damages analysis.

Noar v. Power Escrow — San Diego Superior Court civil case

San Diego Superior · 11/2020 · Complaint filed

Teaches changed-instruction and escrow-party communication patterns from a Superior Court civil file.

Wire Instructions
Court index listing only. Search case number 37-2020-00042042-CU-PN-CTL on the San Diego Superior Court index. third-party court-record aggregator and media jury-award reporting are supporting context, not court findings.

Warington Lumber v. Fullerton Mortgage & Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 11/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows how an escrow-company withholding letter, draw checks, verification step, and release decision can become the decisive source record.

Escrow Instructions Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Construction-loan draw and contract-liability row; use the source for exact duties and damages.

Harriman v. Tetik — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 11/1961 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches when pre-close escrow disbursements are authorized by instructions and when sellers may still owe restitution after a failed business-sale escrow.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Lee v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 160 (supporting link) cites Harriman in the limited-duty cluster.

Pioneer Title v. Guttman — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 11/1959 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows escrow holder reimbursement after paying a third-party demand to complete a sale when sellers had approved the demand — applies Jones on conditional escrow deposits.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Jones v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. (1918) 178 Cal. 375 (supporting link) states the conditional-deposit damages rule.

Dawson v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 11/1950 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows how conditional escrow holds and third-party approval requirements affect whether deposited funds are attachable — cited in Amen for strict instruction compliance.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528 (supporting link) on strict escrow instruction compliance.

Oshana Escrow / Nora Yefima — C.D. Cal. federal court docket

C.D. Cal. · 10/2012 · Complaint filed

Teaches escrow disbursement and short-sale wire-transfer review from a federal court docket tied to Oshana Escrow.

Wire Instructions
Judgment entry for defendant Yefima reviewed on public court-record source. Related indictment docket United States v. DeSilva, 2:12-cr-00959: related federal docket LASD Nixle notice is supporting context only.

Ghirardo v. Antonioli — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 10/1996 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches why payoff-demand precision, escrow payment, close, and reconveyance timing are core source records when later claimed balances appear.

Payoff Demands Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row for omitted payoff-demand sums after close; not an escrow-holder fault record.

Claussen v. First America Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 10/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches limits on escrow and title-agent duties to verify oral down-payment instructions against written escrow terms.

Seller Proceeds Wire Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Trial court No. C 529 198 (Los Angeles Superior). Cited in Universal Bank v. Lawyers Title (1997) on oral instruction inquiries.

Ruth v. Lytton Savings — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 10/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches automatic subordination escrows: recording order alone does not cure loans that violate express subordination caps on amount, rate, or lien priority.

Seller Proceeds Wire Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Protective Equity Trust v. Bybee (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 139 (supporting link) applies Ruth subordination limits to construction-loan escrows.

Ingram v. Glissman — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 2 · 10/1956 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows source records needed when business-sale escrow instructions, notes, deposit money, license issuance, and close conditions are disputed.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Pleading and demurrer posture; allegations are not findings against the broker, surety, or escrow holder.

Shiver v. Liberty Building-Loan — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 10/1940 · Supreme Court opinion

Defines limited escrow-agency boundaries across related refinance instructions: what each party authorized, what the escrow holder knew, and when instructions must be communicated.

Escrow Instructions
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row on instruction-communication limits; not a modern operational finding.

Greenzweight v. Title Guarantee — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 10/1934 · Supreme Court opinion

Defines when an escrow holder has complied with a hold-until-paid instruction before releasing reconveyance documents during a refinance — critical for bank-failure and cleared-ch…

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Shreeves v. Pearson (1925) 194 Cal. 699 (supporting link) discusses agency shifts when escrow conditions are met.

Ovation v. Chicago Title — S.D. Cal. order

S.D. Cal. · 09/2020 · Federal court order

Shows the escrow-account proof problem in a liquor-license funding platform: who owned the funds, which escrow accounts held them, and what source records supported return obligat…

Seller Proceeds Wire Instructions
Federal pleading order only. The source recites allegations and pleading rulings; allegations are not findings.

Flyer's Body Shop v. Ticor Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 09/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow holders cannot rely on loan-officer strike-throughs of lien limits without signed principal instructions — real-estate syndication second-deed context.

Disbursement Authorization Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Claussen v. First America Title (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 429 (supporting link) on limited escrow agency duties.

Business Title v. DLSE — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 09/1976 · Supreme Court opinion

Shows how escrow-holder notices, creditor claims, levy timing, disbursements, and interpleader define who controls liquor-license sale proceeds.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Stakeholder and creditor-priority row; not a finding that the escrow holder mishandled funds.

United States v. Approximately $325,690.00 Seized From Bank of America — E.D. Cal. order

E.D. Cal. · 01/2024 · Federal court order

Original instruction, change request, independent known-contact callback/source, match/gap notes, reviewer, and office action before release.

Wire Instructions Seller Proceeds
Federal civil-forfeiture order only. The order denied motions and recited allegations for that posture; it is not a finding that any escrow party was liable.

Tribeca v. First American Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 1 · 08/2015 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows why incoming-wire originator records, escrow-account labels, depositor identity, and written disbursement authority belong in the reviewed file.

Wire Instructions Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Bench-trial affirmance for First American; use for wire-originator and instruction documentation, not as a company or safety conclusion.

Markowitz v. Fidelity National — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 4 · 08/2006 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the duty boundary for sub-escrow payoff and reconveyance handling when money and documents are exchanged to clear a deed of trust.

Payoff Demands Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Nonsuit posture; use for sub-escrow duty boundaries and reconveyance-file sequence.

Contemporary Investments v. Safeco Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 3 · 08/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Clarifies when escrow-file notice, assignment or proceeds instructions, and post-close amendments matter for third-party payment instructions.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Judgment reversed for Safeco; use for escrow-file knowledge and assignment limits.

Zang v. Northwestern Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 08/1982 · Court of Appeal opinion

Classic escrow-holder negligence case on reconveyance timing, oral instructions, and competing lender recordings.

Seller Proceeds Payoff Demands
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Pollock v. Tiano — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 08/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches sloppy escrow instructions cannot bind sellers to subordinate beyond the written $96,000 construction cap — buyers must perform the subordination deal they actually negoti…

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Protective Equity Trust v. Bybee (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 139 (supporting link) on enforcing subordination only for agreed construction loans.

Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 07/2010 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches post-close escrow disbursement duties and lender reliance on recorded closing instructions after funding.

Payoff Demands Seller Proceeds
Appellate opinion on Justia (not certified for publication). Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow (1986) supporting link for payoff-instruction conflicts.

Lovelady v. Bryson Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 07/1994 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow files for seller-carried business-sale paper need a document trail showing the promised security interest and recording path.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Claims against the escrow company were resolved on pleadings; no broader practice conclusion is implied.

Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 07/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow holder duties when payoff instructions conflict with recorded note assignments and title-policy notice (Devore purchase escrow).

Payoff Demands Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers Title Co. (2002) 27 Cal.4th 705 (supporting link) later disapproved Kirby in part for stranger-to-escrow tort duty; read together for assignment/payoff instruction evolution.

Sun 'n Sand v. United California Bank — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Court · 07/1978 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches payee-bank inquiry duties when company checks payable to the bank are negotiated by a third party for deposit into an employee account (precursor to Joffe escrow-trust che…

Wire Instructions
Published Supreme Court opinion on demurrer theories only. Not an escrow-holder case — California bank check/UCC lane cited in later escrow-trust deposit opinions.

Business Title v. United States — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 07/1978 · Supreme Court opinion

Shows how escrow instructions, notice to creditors, transfer approval, deferred disbursement, and interpleader shape priority to funds held in escrow.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Creditor-priority and interpleader row; not a public claim about escrow-holder fault.

Colonial Savings v. Redwood Empire Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 07/1965 · Court of Appeal opinion

Contrasts definite written escrow instructions with ambiguous ones — when a lender tells the holder exactly which exceptions to allow, the holder is not liable for liens the instr…

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Spaziani v. Millar (1963) 215 Cal.App.2d 667 (supporting link) discusses indefinite escrow instructions where a nonsuit was improper.

Turner v. Citizens National Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 07/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow instructions cannot modify a purchase agreement unless all principals authorize the change — agents with express no-modification limits cannot bind co-sellers.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Leiter v. Handelsman (1959) 125 Cal.App.2d 243 (supporting link) on escrow instruction integration with purchase contracts.

Southall v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 1 · 07/1952 · Court of Appeal opinion

Lee v. Title cites Southall for the rule that escrow holders are not liable for losses while following instructions and not required to police unrelated seller delays.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion on demurrer only. Lee v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 160 (supporting link) groups Southall with the limited-agency cluster.

Appel v. Boston National Title Agency — S.D. Cal. order

S.D. Cal. · 06/2020 · Federal court order

Shows why escrow-account deposit records, written escrow instructions, control over release, and interpleader statements matter when funds are not returned promptly.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Federal pleading order only. The row tracks escrow-account and instruction-control allegations, not final liability findings.

Village View Escrow v. Professional Business Bank — L.A. Superior Court civil file

L.A. Superior · 06/2011 · Complaint filed

Teaches corporate escrow wire-release disputes and bank authentication duties from a Superior Court civil complaint and settlement.

Wire Instructions
Court index search only — no public case number captured. Search party names Village View Escrow and Professional Business Bank on the L.A. Superior Court civil index (filed 2011). Settlement reporting is supporting context, not a court finding.

Pasternak v. Boutris — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 06/2002 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the threshold source question: whether a transaction was an escrow and what disbursement conditions the escrow agreements required.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Coverage and escrow-definition row; read the source for administrative and indemnity scope.

Bartold v. Glendale Federal Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 3 · 06/2000 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that payoff, reconveyance, trustee, lender, and escrow correspondence must show who was supposed to deliver and record post-payoff documents.

Payoff Demands Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Procedural class-certification and summary-judgment posture; use for payoff/reconveyance workflow, not individual liability conclusions.

Vournas v. Fidelity National Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 1 · 06/1999 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the source boundary for escrow-holder disclosure duties, escrow instructions, trust instruments, and claimed nonparty or beneficiary protection.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Summary-judgment duty-boundary row; no broader title-company or trustee conclusion is implied.

Siegel v. Fidelity National Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 06/1995 · Court of Appeal opinion

Explains lender-only ALTA policies in refinance escrows and third-party-beneficiary duties to disclose recorded liens.

Payoff Demands Wire Instructions
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Altadena Escrow v. Beebe — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 06/1960 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that the file must show when both sides deposited instructions, when conditions could be met, and when cancellation demand was received.

Escrow Instructions Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Interpleader posture is used to show escrow-condition timing, not fault ranking.

Rost v. Bryson — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 06/1953 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches how courts construe ambiguous escrow disbursement language and why holders are protected when instructions reasonably authorize a commission payout after full deposit.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Lee v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 160 (supporting link) cites Rost for no liability while following escrow instructions.

Angus v. London — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3 · 06/1949 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows the file-record importance of executed instructions, alterations, notice to parties, plan-delivery conditions, and interpleader deposit control.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Interpleader and instruction-formation row; cross-complaint allegations are not findings.

Thomas v. Corbyn Restaurant Development — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 05/2025 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches settlement-fund wire verification and imposter-rule loss allocation when disbursement instructions change midstream.

Wire Instructions
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Personal-injury settlement context — wire-instruction verification pattern applies to escrow disbursement workflows.

Bedrock Financial v. IRS — E.D. Cal. order

E.D. Cal. · 05/2013 · Federal court order

Shows refinance escrow proof issues: closing instructions, lien priority, payoff amount, tax-lien notice, disbursement ledger, and whether proceeds were routed to junior claims.

Payoff Demands Seller Proceeds
Federal motion-to-dismiss order only. Third-party claims survived in part; use for escrow-disbursement and lien-priority record issues, not broad conclusions about title-company conduct.

Cathay Bank v. Fidelity National Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 05/1996 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows why payoff-demand amounts, sub-escrow payment, close timing, and release/reconveyance records matter in title and escrow files.

Payoff Demands Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Payoff-demand and release-of-obligation row; no fault ranking or public risk conclusion is implied.

Lee v. Escrow Consultants — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1989 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches all-party written amendment clauses: escrow holders may need to check signatories before paying out on a changed instruction, without becoming general conduct investigator…

Disbursement Authorization Wire Instructions
Published appellate opinion on pleading and limitations only at this stage. Diaz v. United California Bank (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 161 (supporting link) on conflicting escrow notices.

Hannon v. Western Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1989 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow holders are limited agents who must follow instructions — they are not trustees required to invest idle escrow balances unless the parties contract for interest.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Schaefer v. Manufacturers Bank (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 70 (supporting link) on limited agency duties.

St. Paul Title v. Meier — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 05/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Limits third-party liability when escrow instructions are disputed — pairs with holder instruction-compliance cases.

Wire Instructions
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

First Central Coast Bank v. Cuesta Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 05/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow funds tied to a commission may remain contingent until close conditions are performed, which matters for file control and release timing.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. The row concerns garnishment and condition-complete timing, not a general assessment of title-company conduct.

Gordon v. D & G Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1975 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches strict compliance with seller escrow instructions and implied duties to pay both sellers their share of proceeds at close.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Diaz v. United California Bank (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 161 (supporting link) on conflicting escrow instructions.

Grover Escrow v. Gole — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 05/1969 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches statutory priority and escrowed-proceeds control in liquor-license transfer escrows.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Doctrine row for escrowed proceeds and creditor-priority controls.

Coast Bank v. Minderhout — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Ct. · 05/1964 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches recorded lender control agreements tied to improvement loans can still create enforceable security — background for equitable subordination disputes in subdivision escrows…

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Jones v. Sacramento Savings (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 522 (supporting link) cites Coast Bank for equitable priority arguments in construction financing.

Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 05/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches equitable estoppel when an escrow holder assures a third-party creditor that loan proceeds will fund promised escrow payments, then closes without honoring canceled instru…

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Diaz v. United California Bank (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 161 (supporting link) on conflicting escrow instructions.

Sterling Escrow v. Vandernoot — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3 · 05/1957 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches stakeholder handling when an escrow company deposits disputed sale proceeds and asks claimants to litigate entitlement.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Interpleader posture is a stakeholder record, not a finding that the escrow company did anything wrong.

Leiter v. Handelsman — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 1 · 05/1954 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches how purchase agreements and escrow instructions are read together, and when written demand to close escrow ends a buyer's obligation to wait for title curative work.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Turner v. Citizens National Bank (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 193 (supporting link) on unauthorized escrow instruction changes.

Wales v. Greene — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 1 · 05/1954 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows how cancellation clauses, mutual cancellation instructions, license-transfer conditions, and held funds or documents define the escrow holder file obligations.

Seller Proceeds Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Business-sale and liquor-license escrow cancellation row; not a finding that the escrow holder mishandled funds.

Norris v. San Mateo County Title — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 05/1951 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches who owns earnest-money deposits held by an escrow agent after default and how res judicata affects recovery from the holder versus the parties.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 80 (supporting link) on estoppel and cancelled escrow instructions.

Rideau v. Stewart Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 1 · 04/2015 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows why sale escrow instructions must make the release path for deposited funds explicit and preserve the basis for any disbursement.

Escrow Instructions Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. This row concerns attorney-fee posture after a prior breach ruling; read the source for the exact instruction and fee scope.

Kangarlou v. Progressive Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 04/2005 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow-holder duties to comply with written instructions and handle license-related facts are file obligations arising from the escrow contract.

Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion summary only. The record is used for escrow-instruction duty and fee-clause posture, not for broader transaction conclusions.

Schaefer v. Manufacturers Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 04/1980 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow liability is bounded by the escrow file — side agreements and instruments handled after close without escrow involvement do not create holder duties.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Axley v. Transamerica Title (1978) 88 Cal.App.3d 1 cited for summary-judgment standard.

Wade v. Lake County Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 04/1970 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow-holder diligence when a buyer's deposit check is accepted with a hold instruction but sellers are not told the funds were never deposited.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Mefford v. Security Title Ins. Co. (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 578 (supporting link) on holding undeposited checks.

Simmons v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 04/1958 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches limits of holder liability for failing to record escrow collateral and how exculpatory clauses interact with written closing instructions — later distinguished in Howard v…

Payoff Demands
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Howard v. Security Title Ins. & Guar. Co. (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 226 (supporting link) on holder duties when instructions are in writing.

Rianda v. San Benito Title — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Ct. · 04/1950 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches strict instruction compliance for escrow deposits — holders are not depositaries who must cash every check received without matching written escrow directions.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Amen v. Merced County Title (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528 (supporting link) on written-instrument limits for escrow payee claims.

Howard v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 04/1937 · Court of Appeal opinion

Distinguishes written buyer-seller escrow instructions from the holder's separate parol agency duty — background for Amen's later four-year written-contract rule and Simmons excul…

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Gallagher v. California Pac. T. & T. Co. (1936) 13 Cal.App.2d 482 (supporting link) involved a holder that undertook written payment duties.

Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers Title — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Court · 03/2002 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches third-party/nonparty escrow duty boundaries, recorded assignments, and lender-of-record disbursement limits from a published Supreme Court opinion.

Escrow Instructions Payoff Demands
Published appellate opinion only. Trial court file No. 767157 (Orange County Superior Court) and Court of Appeal D036868 are cited in the opinion but not separately reviewed here., not a public court link.

Escrow Agents Fidelity v. Superior Court — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 5 · 03/1992 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches fidelity-fund and trust-obligation boundaries for licensed escrow agents after trust-obligation losses.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate writ opinion only. This is a fidelity-coverage and prejudgment-remedy row, not a transactional wire-instruction record.

Bruckman v. Parliament Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 03/1987 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches why escrow files must preserve supplemental instructions, title-report timing, cancellation notices, and the close-or-cancel sequence across linked escrows.

Escrow Instructions Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. It resolves issues in a failed escrow transaction; read the opinion for the exact damages and fee scope.

Joffe v. United California Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 03/1983 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches how restrictive payee lines on escrow-trust checks limit deposit and payment when a straw buyer diverts a down payment from the named Wells Fargo escrow account.

Seller Proceeds Wire Instructions
Published appellate opinion on demurrer only. Sun 'n Sand, Inc. v. United California Bank (1978) 21 Cal.3d 671 (supporting link) addresses payee-bank duty on altered checks to the bank as payee.

Ogdahl v. Title Insurance & Trust — California appellate department

Cal. App. Dep't · 03/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches how seller commission instructions and rescission attempts should be recorded before post-close disbursement.

Seller Proceeds Escrow Instructions
Published appellate department opinion only. Use for instruction sequence and disbursement timing, not broad title-company conclusions.

Doyle v. Coughlin — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Div. 2 · 03/1974 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches why escrow close status, license-transfer approval, creditor notices, and interpleader posture are core records in disputed escrow-fund control.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate opinion only. Liquor-license escrow creditor-priority row; no public conduct rating is implied.

Patapoff v. Reliable Escrow Service — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 3 · 03/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches why escrow-service claim cards need posture-first language when the reviewed source is an appellate opinion from a nonsuit posture.

Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Nonsuit posture means the record should not be summarized as a factual finding on the underlying allegations.

Schut v. Doyle — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 03/1959 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches unclosed escrow deposits still interact with vendor's-lien priority — and that encumbrancers for value can outrank an unpaid seller (cited in Ruth v. Lytton for bona fide …

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Ruth v. Lytton Savings (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 831 (supporting link) cites Schut for good-faith encumbrancer transfers despite trust breaches.

Roberts v. Carter & Potruch — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 03/1956 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow holders are agents, not parties, to the underlying sale contract — and that post-close payment duties with oral instructions face short limitations windows.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528 (supporting link) later disapproved this limitations framework for written escrow instructions.

Little Seeds Children's Center v. Citibank — N.D. Cal. order

N.D. Cal. · 02/2025 · Federal court order

Shows how a court analyzed unauthorized payment-order allegations: authorization, security procedure, normal wire history, bank alerts, and rapid transfer timing.

Wire Instructions
Motion-to-dismiss order only. Allegations were assumed as true at the pleading stage, and the case may continue or change posture. Not an escrow transaction — California bank wire lane.

800 Columbia Project v. CMB Wing Lung Bank — C.D. Cal. docket

C.D. Cal. · 02/2021 · Complaint filed

Teaches California Commercial Code wire security procedures and bank refund duties after phishing-driven outbound wires (development account, Newport Beach).

Wire Instructions
Complaint and dismissal order reviewed via public federal docket and filing records; settled before summary judgment. Not an escrow-holder case — bank wire lane.

SASA Investment v. Chhatrala — S.D. Cal. order

S.D. Cal. · 02/2020 · Federal court order

Shows the records needed when funds are wired to a title company as escrow agent: transfer authorization, escrow-party status, purpose instructions, notice, and withdrawal account…

Wire Instructions Escrow Instructions
Federal dismissal order only. Allegations were reviewed under pleading standards and are not findings against Orange Coast Title Company or any bank.

Kirk Corp. v. First American Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 3d Dist. · 02/1990 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows how implied escrow duties from lender instructions can authorize recording a lease cancellation without express subordination language.

Payoff Demands
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Jones v. Sacramento Savings — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 3d Dist. · 02/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow/title officers cannot cure missing subordination forms by switching escrow companies — later loans must meet the written subordination caps to gain priority.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Ruth v. Lytton Savings (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 831 (supporting link) on escrow-closed subordination breaches.

Karras v. Title Ins. — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 02/1954 · Court of Appeal opinion

Leading Court of Appeal statement that escrow holders must follow instructions strictly and answer for unauthorized disbursements — adopted in Amen and later escrow duty cases.

Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528 (supporting link) restates the strict-compliance and diligence standards.

Moore v. Balboa Escrow — California appellate department

San Diego App. Dep't · 02/1953 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches business-sale deposit and commission-disbursement documentation in escrow instructions.

Seller Proceeds Escrow Instructions
Published appellate department opinion only. Business-sale escrow row; use for deposit and instruction sequence.

Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Ct. · 02/1941 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches escrow cancellation cuts off contingent third-party payees — paired with Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow on when estoppel can still bind the holder after instruction changes.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Feinberg v. Intrastate Escrow (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 80 (supporting link) on estoppel after cancelled escrow instructions.

Ozer Holdings v. Citibank — E.D. Cal. docket

E.D. Cal. · 01/2024 · Complaint filed

Teaches California UCC wire-transfer refund and bank-knowledge duties after rapid outbound wires from commercial accounts.

Wire Instructions
Justia docket index and published order excerpt only. Not an escrow-holder case — California bank wire lane.

Tung v. Chicago Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/2021 · Court of Appeal opinion

Modern appellate guidance on foreseeability of damages after escrow closes on a rescinded residential sale.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Citrus El Dorado v. Chicago Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/2019 · Court of Appeal opinion

Clarifies limits on trustee and title-company investigative duties during nonjudicial foreclosure — relevant to payoff and assignment disputes.

Payoff Demands
Published Court of Appeal opinion only.

Branscomb v. JPMorgan Chase Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. Div. 1 · 01/2014 · Court of Appeal opinion

Shows how a zero payoff demand, reconveyance request, escrow receipt, and equitable priority fight can turn on what the escrow file showed and who owed duties.

Payoff Demands Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Equitable-subrogation posture; use for zero-demand and escrow-duty analysis, not as a finding against the dismissed escrow defendants.

Castillo v. Express Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 6 · 01/2007 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches statutory dispute-notice duties for California mobile-home escrows and that form escrow instructions cannot waive Health and Safety Code deposit-hold requirements.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title (2010) D054685 (supporting link) on post-close lender escrow disbursement duties.

Money Store v. Southern California Bank — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/2002 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches lenders can contract directly with escrow banks via closing instructions — escrow addenda cannot override lender disbursement rules without notice (foundation for Plaza Ho…

Wire Instructions Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Plaza Home Mortgage v. North American Title (2010) D054685 (supporting link) applies Money Store to HUD-1 settlement duties after escrow close.

Brown v. Boren — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1999 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches 1990s automatic subordination escrows still require lender compliance with escrow caps — excess loan amounts revive the seller's senior purchase-money lien.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Ruth v. Lytton Savings (1968) 266 Cal.App.2d 831 (supporting link) on subordination conditions and excess loan hazard.

Rooz v. Kimmel — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1997 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches accommodation recordings and hold-harmless releases when escrow/title staff record documents as a non-insured favor — limits recovery for delayed security perfection.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 57 (supporting link) on recording-instruction disputes.

Romo v. Stewart Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1995 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches how credit-bid foreclosures interact with seller proceeds still held in escrow — surplus funds are not automatically swept into the lender's bid.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Money Store v. Southern California Bank (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 722 (supporting link) on post-close escrow disbursement duties.

St. Paul Title v. Meier — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/1986 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches that escrow agents follow written instructions and cannot shift liability to the opposing party's counsel for ambiguous buyer-side instructions.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion on cross-complaint only. Schaefer v. Manufacturers Bank (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 70 (supporting link) on limited escrow agency duties.

Axley v. Transamerica Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 4th Dist. · 01/1978 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches limited escrow agency: no liability for following written instructions when the seller signed amendments listing substituted security and prior encumbrances.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers Title (2002) 27 Cal.4th 705 (supporting link) cites Axley for instruction-compliance limits.

Cohn v. Gramercy Escrow — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1977 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches statutory escrow creditor-priority rules when a liquor-license transfer escrow distributes insufficient cash and a note to the seller before general creditors are paid.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Builders' Control Service v. North American Title (1962) 205 Cal.App.2d 68 (supporting link) on assignment of escrow proceeds.

Middlebrook-Anderson v. Southwest Savings — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1971 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches lenders are third-party beneficiaries of seller subordination agreements only while loan proceeds are applied to the agreed construction purpose — priority is contingent, …

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Jones v. Sacramento Savings (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 522 (supporting link) on conditional subordination in subdivision escrows.

Gramercy Escrow v. Superior Court — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. Div. 2 · 01/1971 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the file-control question when a creditor tries to reach escrow funds before all close conditions have occurred.

Seller Proceeds Post-Closing Evidentiary Disputes
Published appellate writ opinion only. It addresses attachment posture and escrow status before close, not a final merits finding against any party.

Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the limited-agency rule: escrow holders follow instructions and are not liable for policing unrelated party conduct absent collusion or instruction breach.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion on demurrer only. Schaefer v. Manufacturers Bank (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 70 (supporting link) on out-of-escrow transactions.

Akin v. Business Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. · 01/1968 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches exculpatory escrow clauses do not bar recovery when the holder willfully departs from instructions — including geographic recordation errors after close.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Lee v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 160 (supporting link) on limited duty to police unrelated suspicious facts.

Miller v. Citizens Savings — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1967 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches courts read escrow instructions and subordination riders together — lenders cannot claim priority when the recorded loan exceeds the seller-approved construction cap.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Protective Equity Trust v. Bybee (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 139 (supporting link) cites Miller for single-transaction subordination analysis.

Jonathan Manor v. Artisan — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1966 · Court of Appeal opinion

Classic escrow-closing pattern on promissory notes marked unsecured in written instructions versus security interests in conveyed lots.

Seller Proceeds Payoff Demands
Published Court of Appeal opinion only (1966). Escrow-instruction characterization of notes as unsecured is central holding.

Reusche v. California Pac. Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1965 · Court of Appeal opinion

Allocates loss between innocent parties when a forged escrow loan is completed through a title company's escrow department and the owner later acquiesces in the disbursement.

Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. California Pac. Title & Trust Co. v. Bank of America (1936) 12 Cal.App.2d 437 (supporting link) addresses forged escrow chains and money had and received.

Stockwell v. Lindeman — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1964 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the industry-standard subordination rider text Pollock and Burrow reference — construction proceeds must actually fund improvements to gain priority.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Burrow v. Timmsen (1963) 223 Cal.App.2d 283 (supporting link) on enforcing standard-form subordination clauses.

Contra Costa County Title v. Waloff — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1964 · Court of Appeal opinion

Bridge case between strict-instruction breaches and Prentice-style recovery of attorney fees as escrow damages when a holder mishandles seller proceeds.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 618 (supporting link) on attorney fees as escrow damages.

Prentice v. North American Title — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Ct. · 01/1963 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches sellers may recover litigation costs as escrow damages when a holder mishandles trust funds — foundational measure-of-damages case for escrow fee disputes.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Hannon v. Western Title (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 1122 (supporting link) on limited common-law escrow duties.

Spaziani v. Millar — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1963 · Court of Appeal opinion

Contrasts indefinite escrow instructions with Colonial Savings' definite lender letters — teaches when ambiguity creates triable holder-duty issues at trial.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Colonial Savings & L. Assn. v. Redwood Empire Title Co. (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 186 (supporting link) on definite written lender escrow instructions.

Builders' Control Service v. North American Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow disbursement duties after recorded notice that sale proceeds were assigned to a fund-control agent (foundation for later assignment/payoff cases).

Seller Proceeds Payoff Demands
Published appellate opinion only. Summit Financial Holdings v. Continental Lawyers Title (2002) 27 Cal.4th 705 (supporting link) later limited stranger-to-escrow tort duties but discusses Builders' Control assignment principles.

Collins v. Home Savings — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches Van Nuys subdivision escrows: lenders and title companies cannot expand subordination by a later blanket agreement when construction disbursements violate the original esc…

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Jones v. Sacramento Savings (1967) 248 Cal.App.2d 522 (supporting link) on conditional subordination in construction escrows.

Amen v. Merced County Title — California Supreme Court

Cal. Supreme Ct. · 01/1962 · Supreme Court opinion

Teaches third-party escrow payees need a written, enforceable instruction trail — limits oral side deals when funds are disbursed without a signed payee instruction.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust (1941) 17 Cal.2d 484 (supporting link) on third-party beneficiary and rescission limits.

Mefford v. Security Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 5th Dist. · 01/1962 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches limits on escrow-holder liability when a deposit is accepted as a check, held uncashed, and sellers later amend instructions before canceling escrow.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published appellate opinion only. Wade v. Lake County Title (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 824 (supporting link) on estoppel when certifying undeposited checks.

Francis v. Eisenmayer — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1959 · Court of Appeal opinion

Explains contract (not tort) recovery when escrow instructions are breached — companion to Karras and the Amen strict-compliance cluster.

Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Karras v. Title Ins. & Guar. Co. (1954) 118 Cal.App.2d 659 (supporting link) on strict instruction compliance.

Shumaker v. Rippy — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1955 · Court of Appeal opinion

Historical limitations case in the escrow cluster later disapproved in Amen — useful for understanding when written instruction suits get four years instead of two.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Amen v. Merced County Title Co. (1962) 58 Cal.2d 528 (supporting link) disapproved this approach for written escrow instructions.

Montgomery v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1948 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches strict compliance with escrow instructions when escrow staff alter recorded instruments after deposit — void deed and limited damages framework.

Disbursement Authorization Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Turner v. Citizens National Bank (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 193 (supporting link) on unauthorized escrow instruction changes.

Watts v. Mohr — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1948 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches strict compliance with escrow agreements and the need for final recording or filing instructions to be clear in the file.

Escrow Instructions
Published appellate opinion only. Older doctrine row; use for strict-compliance principle and document sequence.

Bank of America v. Hirsch Mercantile — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1944 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches the baseline rule for qualified subordination agreements — later lenders gain priority only when their loans meet the seller's written conditions.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Collins v. Home Savings (1962) 205 Cal.App.2d 86 (supporting link) applies conditional subordination to GI subdivision escrows.

Hancock Oil v. Hopkins — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 01/1944 · Supreme Court opinion

Pairs with Security Trust v. Carlsen on escrow interpleader — defines when holders remain mere stakeholders despite owing delivery obligations under the escrow.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Security Trust etc. Bank v. Carlsen (1928) 205 Cal. 309 (supporting link) is the leading escrow interpleader companion case.

Gallagher v. California Pac. Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1936 · Court of Appeal opinion

Applies the Jones v. Title Guaranty measure-of-damages rule to a 1930s title-company escrow — foundational for quantifying seller and depositor losses after unauthorized disbursem…

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Jones v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. (1918) 178 Cal. 375 (supporting link) states the conditional-deposit damages rule.

California Pac. Title v. Bank of America — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1936 · Court of Appeal opinion

Early allocation-of-loss case for forged escrow chains between title companies and deposit banks — background for Reusche and modern unauthorized-disbursement disputes.

Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Reusche v. California Pac. Title Ins. Co. (1965) 231 Cal.App.2d 731 (supporting link) on forged escrow loans completed through a title insurer.

Blackburn v. McCoy — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1935 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches foundational limited-agency escrow law — holders follow written instructions only, a rule Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust and St. Paul Title v. Meier later apply to disclos…

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Lee v. Title Insurance & Trust (1968) 264 Cal.App.2d 160 (supporting link) cites Blackburn for no duty beyond escrow instructions.

Newport Bay Dredging v. Helm — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist. · 01/1932 · Court of Appeal opinion

Teaches escrow cancellation ends contingent payee rights because the holder is not a trustee until close — foundational companion to Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust.

Seller Proceeds
Published appellate opinion only. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust (1941) 17 Cal.2d 484 (supporting link) on rescission and third-party beneficiary limits.

Kellum v. San Mateo County Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1932 · Court of Appeal opinion

Applies Lattin to a county title company's escrow department — companion to Norris v. San Mateo County Title on deposit ownership in the same county.

Seller Proceeds
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Lattin v. Gillette (1891) 95 Cal. 317 (supporting link) is the leading limitations authority.

Security Trust Bank v. Carlsen — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 01/1928 · Supreme Court opinion

Foundational interpleader case for escrow holders — conflicting claims to the deposit do not create independent liability that blocks the stakeholder remedy.

Seller Proceeds Disbursement Authorization
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Hancock Oil Co. v. Hopkins (1944) 24 Cal.2d 497 (supporting link) applies the same stakeholder test to escrow interpleader.

Mitchell v. California-Pacific Title — California Court of Appeal

Cal. Ct. App. · 01/1926 · Court of Appeal opinion

Links the California-Pacific Title insurer line to the Howard/Lattin limitations cluster before Reusche and Cal Pac Title v. Bank of America forged-escrow cases.

Disbursement Authorization
Published Court of Appeal opinion only. Howard v. Security Title Ins. & Guar. Co. (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 226 (supporting link) applied the same Lattin framework.

Shreeves v. Pearson — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 01/1925 · Supreme Court opinion

Defines how escrow agency status changes once contractual conditions are met — cited in Greenzweight and later bank-failure timing disputes.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Greenzweight v. Title Guar. & Tr. Co. (1934) 1 Cal.2d 577 (supporting link) applies hold-until-paid timing after cleared checks.

Lattin v. Gillette — California Supreme Court

Cal. · 01/1891 · Supreme Court opinion

Foundational limitations rule cited in Howard, Shumaker, and Amen — distinguishes writings that create liability from writings that only evidence a breach of an earlier oral duty.

Seller Proceeds
Published Supreme Court opinion only. Howard v. Security Title Ins. & Guar. Co. (1937) 20 Cal.App.2d 226 (supporting link) applied Lattin to escrow instruction suits.

Showing 129 records.